BLOGGER TEMPLATES AND TWITTER BACKGROUNDS
Showing posts with label global cooling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label global cooling. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

OZONE IMPROVING, but GOV'T WILL TAX YOU ANYWAY

The hole in the ozone layer is smaller in 2009 than in 2008, reports Breitbart. But of course, that won't keep Obama from taxing you and your family $1761 a year to fix a problem that's naturally getting better. Obama is introducing a 15% tax hike for a problem that's getting better without us doing a thing.


Read more...

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

Obama's Home State Epicenter of Global Cooling

Obama's home state is now the epicenter of this week's global cooling narrative. Chicago ended August with temperature lows not seen since 1872. I know Obama likes to compare himself with Abe Lincoln. That's ironic because Chicago hasn't been this cold since 7 years after honest Abe died. We should open the history books and find out what US Grant had to say about how humans were destroying the planet last time Chicago reached this inferno state. Can somebody find me a Civil War book and look up global warming?


Read more...

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Global Warming Update: August Blizzard!

What an inferno! It's August and it's snowing. Praise God government help is coming to turn down the temperature. I'm beginning to melt.

Watch the video
from Casper, WY and notice the record lows and heavy snow.


Read more...

Friday, July 17, 2009

Vote NO Suzanne Kosmas on Obamacare

It is imperative that Americans stay informed and monitor their representative's actions. There is a great site called The People Decide which allows you view your representatives and their voting records, to vote on issues and see how other people are voting, to read the bills. On a single well designed dashboard you have your reps votes compared to yours to see what percentage of the time you agree with them. There's also links to email them. Today I wrote a letter to my representative to ask her to vote no on a couple of bills.


Mrs. Kosmas,

I am writing to express my displeasure with your vote in favor of the American Clean Energy and Security Acts of 2009. This decision was, in my opinion, naive and based on bad science, and will cripple our economy. It is unsustainable for us to prohibit and industrialized nation from emitting carbon. I believe that this policy represents and unconstitutional violation of federal power over the private sector. The majority of Americans agree with me and do not want to see such a radical liberal policy hindering American economic progress.

Further, I am writing to express my strong desire that you vote NO to the America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 should it come for vote. Particularly page 16 of the Bill, which limits the consumer choice of a private plan and will end up monopolizing the health care industry. Countries with public health care suffer poor health care and immense tax rates of greater than 50% for the entire population. This will be catastrophic for our prosperity and a violation of our freedom and unlawful intrusion of the government into the private sector.

The Constitution limits the power of government and protects the free market. By voting yes on Energy Act, you have cooperated in violating my freedom. A vote of yes on the health care bill would amount to the same misconduct. I cannot afford to have someone so willing to trample on my rights in office any longer.


Read more...

Thursday, July 16, 2009

Biden: Isn't the Economy Great?

Biden says the stimulus is working. All we have to do is follow him everywhere he goes to see all the jobs saved. He said:

"Come see what I see everywhere I go: workers rehired, factories reopened, cops on the street, teachers in the classroom, progress toward getting our economy back on the move."

Here's my response: Mr. Biden, if the stimulus was working so well, we wouldn't have to follow you around, because we'd see the jobs being created where we are. I'm not sure where you're going, but the current unemployment rate kinda makes me think things aren't as rosy as you think they are. Instead of us entering your world, where everybody has jobs and too much money to handle, why don't you come hang out in the real world and help two of my friends who lost their jobs this week find new ones. See, my friends, unlike most unmotivated and apathetic liberals, they actually don't want to be dependent on government or to live off of unemployment handouts. If you really want to help, then lend a hand to people who actually contribute to the economy and stop taxing everyone to death so that companies can hire my friends instead of paying you and your planet-saving super hero friends to save our cooling planet from getting too hot.


Read more...

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Global Cooling Update: RECORD LOWS in New Hampshire

This is so enjoyable to behold. It seems as though the most liberal areas of the country are the hardest hit with global cooling. New Hampshire is suffering record lows. Any body up for some snowball fights, or maybe dog sled races. Mush!

UPDATED:

Record lows were also posted in Rochester, NY (48 degrees) and Allentown, PA (50 degrees) on July 14th, 2009. Note, there were 593 record lows recorded in June alone (read Ice Age Now, Record Lows 2009, June 17 entry). If you count the 214 tied records, this makes 807 record or tied low temperatures last month alone! Some warming trend, huh?


Read more...

Monday, July 13, 2009

Global Cooling & Northeast Tourism Industry

Welcome to Mocking Liberalism, the global cooling headquarters, where things are freezing over so fast Frosty the Snowman might soon be able to celebrate Christmas year-round.

One of the tragic affects of this global cooling is how it is destroying the tourism industry in the Northeast, which depends on weather being warm enough, at least 80 degrees in the summer time, which it's not.

That's right, folks, our most liberal region is ground zero for God's making a laughingstock of our grandiose claims that man can control the weather. Just think if Obama's right (I know, it would be the first time), and this Cap-and-Tax bill passes, the the climate gets even cooler--what hope would the northeast tourism economy have then.


Read more...

Sunday, July 12, 2009

The Religion of Global Warming on a cooling planet

Damned Global Warming Skeptics, Right Wing News

Global warming is like any false religion. It's based on blind faith and eyes closed to facts, logic, reasoning that anyone with a toddler's intelligence could follow. And it's hilarious to see the utter denial of this naive religion's green panic police realizing that their visions of grandiosity and planet saving are not being realized because the planet's actually cooling itself without their help. Instead of waking up to the silliness of the lies they have believed and spread, the desperate libs only start yelling louder, staying faithful to the unnecessary cause, because, well, Pastor Al Gore told them to, and anyone smart enough to invent the Internet shouldn't be argued with.


Read more...

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

G8 Leaders Agree on World Temperature

Please only read this if you can stomach profound human arrogance and utter liberal lunacy. From the Times Online (UK):

America and the other seven richest economies agreed to the goal of keeping the world’s average temperature from rising more than 2C (3.6F).
Some countries are gathering together to decide what the temperature should be? Are you serious? Hey world leaders...you're joking, right? I mean, how dumb do you think we are? Do you think the earth really cares what you decide? We can legislate the weather now? Sweet!

After your done saving our planet, O Great Ones, I've got some ideas of real problems you could be solving, like lowering taxes and allowing our capitalist system to flourish the way the Constitution requires.


Is this not the epitome of arrogance and futility? These guys just got together to decide what the average temperature of the world should be. LOL!


Read more...

Sunday, July 5, 2009

Global Warming Update: Coolest NY June since 1958

Wake up people, we're going to hell in a hand basket! Quick, turn off your cars before they turn Planet Earth into an blazing ball of fire.

Note: if you absolutely, positively, have to drive, only drive in New York. They can afford it a bit more because they just had the COOLEST JUNE IN 51 YEARS! Does anyone else find this hilarious? The most liberal city in America is the epicenter of the global cooling phenomenon, suffering their coldest June in more than half a century, in the middle of liberalism's push to cram a global warming hoax agenda down America's throats.

Somebody call Al Gore and tell him to leave New York right away. He must be there. Everywhere the guy shows up it snows.

It's as if God is saying, "Hmm, these libs think people can control the weather? Only I can do that folks! Just to prove it, I'm going to start freezing the earth over. Starting in New York, of course."

If you're interested, check out a Fox News Article from 2008 which notes scientific observation of the largest temperature change in history (and it was a DECREASE in temperature). Another thing scientists have observed is that--and this is a shocker--solar activity has more of an impact on the earths temperature than human activity. That's right, you heard it first here, according to scientists, the sun has more to do with how hot it is outside than what car you drive.

Now, just to be fair to our environmentalist panic police, your car can certainly control the climate to some degree. Through a common device called "Air Conditioning", you can control the temperature of a small portion of the universe known by scientists as the your car's interior. But the temperature outside the car has more to do with the sun (i.e. "solar activity" according to really smart people who can figure this stuff out).

Have we really reached a place as a nation in which this sort of thing is necessary to say?


Read more...

Thursday, July 2, 2009

Letter to My Senator (Nelson): Cap-and-Trade and Health Care Reform

I wrote this letter and sent it to my Senator and Congressional Representative. I express my desire for the Constitution to be respected and for the Cap-and-Trade and Nationalized Health Care to be opposed. If you would like to use it, feel free to copy and send it along to your representatives.



I am writing for a number of reasons, primarily to express my displeasure with two unconstitutional bills that have been proposed, and if passed, would not only break the Supreme Law of our land, but would damage our life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. These two bills are the Cap-and-Trade Bill and the Nationalized Health Care proposition currently being discussed. I will treat these both individually.

CAP-AND-TRADE

First, I am very disappointed in the recent vote in Congress to pass the Cap-and-Trade bill. This vote was irresponsible in my opinion for several reasons:

First, it was based on suspect scientific data. The scientific community is not even convinced that climate change is even a problem. The EPA’s suppression of Alan Carlin’s report on the current global cooling trend lends credence to the growing opinion of many Americans that Global Warming is a theory sustained by liberal political ideology, not scientific integrity. The NIPCC has released a condemning report “Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate” (ISDN 1-934791-01-6). Scientific data shows a cooling trend over the last ten years, and history shows that less than 40 years ago the predominant theory was one of global cooling.

Proponents of this bill need to actually consider the audacity of the claim that man is capable of controlling the weather. Really? Man can control the weather? Such outrageous propaganda is the stuff of fiction, of conspiracy theory, of childish fantasy, believable only for the naïve and gullible, not appropriate for the serious and responsible leaders such as yourselves, who ought to see through such adolescent foolishness and govern with discretion fitting of those given the privilege of statesmanship. If the public were to learn that its leadership had reached a level of incompetence and actually believed such irrational theories, I can only imagine the response of fear and potential anarchy that would justifiably ensue as the people worked to establish a new and more capable representative government. That is happening in America—the silent majority is learning of the growing gap between themselves and the increasingly disconnected ruling class, and is working to change that disturbing trend.

Second, even if there were a problem of Global Warming, the proposed changes in the Cap-And-Trade system will not solve the problem. The bill is clearly designed as a tax, which will only remove more money from the already receding US economy. If Global Warming is a man-made problem, and if all countries share in the culpability, then reversing the trend requires cooperation of all nations to effect the necessary change.

There is no evidence that other countries will adopt the US policy, which means that the efforts on the part of the US will only handicap Americans and put us at a further economic disadvantage compared to the rest of the world, as we fail to solve a problem that scientific integrity is increasingly suggesting does not even exist. It’s for this very reason that the Senate has agreed in years past not to accept any such treaties without such world consensus. The bill recently and foolishly passed by Congress carelessly throws our money at a fabricated problem designed to create the sense of false alarm in which unconstitutional government seizure of power has historically thrived. Keep your wit about you. Don’t fall prey to this.

Third, I cannot afford the burden of this bill. I cannot afford a 58% gasoline price increase, a 55% natural gas price increase, a 56% home oil price increase, a 90% electricity price increase, an annual tax increase $4,609 and the potential of paying $71,000 in additional taxes from 2012 to 2035. These numbers, as projected by the Heritage Foundation are numbers that, even if they are slightly higher than actuality, still represent the types of tax increases that Americans cannot afford. You are elected to protect my freedoms, not to tax me. The taxes you do raise should be only as necessary to fulfill government’s role to provide for the common defense as outlined in the Constitution, not to institutionalize a disproven theory to solve a problem that doesn’t exist. Please respect my freedom, protect this economy, and resist the corrupting lure to abuse your power and break trust with those who chose you as their public servant, not as their tax collector.

NATIONALIZED HEALTH-CARE

The second reason I am writing is to express my vehement opposition to the nationalization of health care. I am opposed to this for several reasons. I trust that if logic and reason have any value to you, you will be persuaded by these fairly obvious and academic points:

First, what is being proposed has been tried in a variety of nations throughout the world and has a proven track record of lowering the quality of health care. I guess we should not be surprised that government involvement decreases the quality and efficiency of personal care. Health care systems in which government regulation impedes free market principals inevitably delay care, increase taxes and ultimately bring the advancement of health sciences to a grinding halt. The reason why America has historically had the best health care system in the world is because government has been sufficiently removed from the picture, allowing competition and the principals of capitalism to inspire innovation in the service of the common good. The downturn of health care in recent years has been a result of the severely heightened government regulation, the resultant frivolous lawsuits that followed, and the introduction of the public options of Medicare. True health care reform must only involve a retraction of these hindrances to the system.

This is a truism that fiscal liberals and proponents of nationalized health care do not understand: government can only serve the common good by protecting free-market incentive, not by suppressing it with regulation portrayed as a ‘public option’. We’ve tried public options. They’ve failed and corrupted the system. The supposed public option under consideration will only limit true options and ultimately produce a monopoly and become the only option.

Government grants do not create scientific advancements. It’s the desire of individuals to create wealth has served the common good and made America the great nation that it is today. The Constitution protects this. Please don’t go down in history as the generation of politicians that ultimately destroyed American freedom by ignoring the very laws that the blood of patriots has secured for us.

On both of these issues, the Cap-And-Trade and Nationalized Health Care, you are being tempted to break the law. The Constitution delineates and limits the powers of Congress, and the Tenth Amendment specifies that all powers not delineated be reserved to the states and the people of those states. The power to dictate health care options for citizens, and the power to limit a businesses ability to produce carbon emissions is not explicitly granted the Congress and is by virtue reserved to the states. Any law passed which attempts to set such restrictions would violate the rights of the states and its citizens. Please resist the temptation to usurp this authority and state sovereignty and thereby violate our freedom.

The very fact that I would insist on our Constitutional freedoms has probably caused you to write me off as a radical. If freedom is a radical idea, then I plead guilty to that charge—and you should know that this great country is full of my sort of radicals who are being awakened by such unlawful propositions as these two terrible bills. For your own perseverance in office, and for the good of this country, I would encourage you to be a bit more ‘radical’ yourself. Do something ‘radical’ like fulfilling your oath to the people you say you are serving by upholding the Constitution you were elected to defend. If you don’t, we’ll find someone else who will.

You get your power to serve from us. We gave it to you on the premise that you’d govern according to the law. Voting for these unconstitutional laws would constitute a breech of trust and violation of your promise to govern lawfully. In short, I am respectfully informing you that if you support such irresponsible policies, you can be assured of my fierce determination to do use every ounce of my God-given patriotism to protect American freedom from unlawful government actions by replacing you with someone who will show more fiscal restraint and respect for the Constitution.

Thank you,
God Bless America


Read more...

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Hopefully Senator Inhofe is right, and Cap-And-Trade won't pass Senate

James Inhofe, R-Okla. doesn't think Cap-and-Trade will pass the Senate. Hopefully he's right, because if he's wrong, here's what we're looking at:

By 2035:

  • 58% gasoline price increase
  • 55% natural gas price increase
  • 56% home oil price increase
  • 90% electricity price increase
  • Annual tax increase $4,609
  • Average total family cost increase from 2012 to 2035: $71,493
Sounds like a great idea, doesn't it?

HT: AUP2


Read more...

Global warming doesn't exist

650 scientists have spoken against the lie

NIPCC Report: "Nature, Not Human Activity Rules the Climate"

Newsbusters Summary of global cooling trends

Oh, and 30,000 scientists with 9,000 PHD's want to debunk global warming, along with the founder of the Weather Channel


Read more...

Sunday, June 28, 2009

Alan Carlin of EPA: Global temperature going down

Alan Carlin, working for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), wrote a 98-page report that was suppressed by the agency, because it disproved the theory of global warming with sound scientific data. From CNet News:

After reviewing the scientific literature that the EPA is relying on, Carlin said, he concluded that it was at least three years out of date and did not reflect the latest research. "My personal view is that there is not currently any reason to regulate (carbon dioxide)," he said. "There may be in the future. But global temperatures are roughly where they were in the mid-20th century. They're not going up, and if anything they're going down."
Global temperatures are going down. Wake up people: global warming legislation is absolutely worthless, and designed for one purpose alone: tax, tax and tax.


Read more...

Saturday, June 27, 2009

Cap and Trade: want to pay $3k per year more in energy?

Everybody has money to throw away these days. An extra three thousand dollars is nothing. I hear my neighbors practically begging me to take their money from them, throwing large briefcases stuffed with cash on my lawn.

Anybody want to pay an extra $3,000 per year in electrical costs? Well that's what the Cap-and-Trade law just passed in Congress will require. You can read the research here.

Here's my problem with this bill: it's asinine. Global warming doesn't exist. Need proof? Global hurricane threats are at 30 year lows. The earth is cooler right now than it was in 1934. The earth is not warming folks. We had record low temperatures all winter. NASA (i.e. James Hansen) fabricated climate data from 1910-2008, when the real data clearly shows the earth on a cooling trend over the last century.

The earth is not warming. This is the biggest hoax in the history of mankind. The data speaks for itself. Our real concern should be global cooling. The earth is the earth, and the earth is going to warm and cool itself. There's only one thing that warms the earth, it's called the sun. Cutting down a tree isn't going to do it. The sun can, though. We cannot let these liberals use a false alarm, disingenuous fabrication, to limit the free market and ruin the economy.

Not only is this bill asinine, it's utterly unconstitutional. The government is not allowed to interfere in the free market and tell companies what types of energy they can buy, or what they are allowed to burn. The government should be interested in one thing alone, getting out of the way and allowing companies to make money. Yet this administration seems hell-bent on telling companies what kind of cars to buy, how many of their own trees the can cut down, and what type of fuel to burn. All to save a cooling planet from warming, to solve a problem that doesn't exist, and to rally a bunch of people around a needless cause.

This is the tragedy of liberalism. By darkening the minds of people who adhere to it, it takes perfectly capable men and women, and handicaps them. It keeps people full of potential from amounting to anything. It dangles a carrot of ambition and lures them with the lie that if they sell their minds they can do something great, like save a planet, only to splash the cold-water of the scientific fact that the planet's actually cooling by itself in their faces after it's too late, leaving them with nothing but the shame of life-long regret at their own ineptitude and wasted existence.


Read more...

Monday, March 23, 2009

Global Cooling

What would you say to someone who ran about like a mad man trying to convince the world that one thing was happening, when the exact opposite thing was actually happening?



Read more...